pinkhairthing

dear miss justification,
a friend of mine who's relocated just told me she got a new pet. i've come to find out, though, that she misappropriated her pet's name, in fact, taking the name of my pet as her pet's own. further evidence has come to light that she has apparently misappropriated images of the pet as well. i'm actually afraid the "pet" doesn't actually exist at all. isn't this an ethical nightmare? amn't i justified in bringing the news of misappropriation to blogeroos everywhere? shouldn't the people know the truth? and if it's true about the "pet" being a figment, do we need to hold an intervention?

~morally outraged in midtown.

Dear MOM,
I understand your confusion. You feel that because this page is entitled pinkhairthing, uncapitalized, you can send in a submission with total disregard for traditions of capitalization in the english language. Surely you understand from reading my page, however, that I regularly employ capitalization as well as a full complement of punctuational flourishes. All three branches of our government are now controlled by the Republicans, the lone dissenter to Iraq-attack having been killed with his family in a "plane crash." Must we really lose our written language as well? Is there not enough pain and suffering in this world already?
As to the fake puppies powder keg, well, I am going to have to meet with both parties in chambers before I can make a ruling. If any reader can provide insight or evidence into this juggernaut, I would much appreciate it.
Yours truly, madly, and deeply,
Pinky